All pain, whose gain? The surprising implications of a new legal theory for redistricting
(cross-posted with my new Substack) Lots of pixels have been spilled on a legal theory once considered fringe, the Independent State Legislatu...
Senate: 48 Dem | 52 Rep (range: 47-52)
Control: R+2.9% from toss-up
Generic polling: Tie 0.0%
Control: Tie 0.0%
Harris: 265 EV (239-292, R+0.3% from toss-up)
Moneyball states: President NV PA NC
Click any tracker for analytics and data
Where did this decade’s festival of partisan gerrymandering come from? Dave Daley dives into a trove of documents by Thomas Hofeller and other architects of the grand plan to make hundreds of Congressional and legislative seats uncompetitive after the 2010 Census.
Suppose Republican gerrymanderers are really successful in packing Democrats in just a few “safe” districts, and also cracking the Republicans into districts that are just barely Republican. This gives the Republicans an advantage. But when the party climate shifts toward Democrats, a lot of those carefully crafted Republican districts will become toss-ups or even lean Democratic. (Mutatis mutandis for Democratic legislatures’ gerrymanders.)
Interesting to watch it play out.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/30/politics/2018-state-of-play-analysis/index.html
Agree. http://election.princeton.edu/2013/10/11/has-the-shutdown-leveled-the-house-playing-field/
Note that this is exactly what happened to Elbridge Gerry’s original Gerry-mander
Because what goes without saying should be said:
https://academic.oup.com/poq/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/poq/nfx047/4837043
Freebie version:
http://www.aapor.org/Education-Resources/Reports/An-Evaluation-of-2016-Election-Polls-in-the-U-S.aspx