Protected: Two ways to estimate primary outcomes without polls (transcript)
This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: Password:...
Senate: 48 Dem | 52 Rep (range: 47-52)
Control: R+2.9% from toss-up
Generic polling: Tie 0.0%
Control: Tie 0.0%
Harris: 265 EV (239-292, R+0.3% from toss-up)
Moneyball states: President NV PA NC
Click any tracker for analytics and data
(See open thread #1 – I am traveling. These are prewritten posts. Follow returns at HuffPollster.)
7:00pm: Journalists already have entrance/exit poll data, but this early in the evening, they usually do not quote it directly. They may start hinting how it’s Hillary Clinton’s night. Wins and losses will be used as a shorthand to follow the results. But keep in mind that it is not the votes that matter, but the delegate counts – especially on the Republican side.
A number of states should come in very strong for Hillary Clinton: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Minnesota, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. In each of these states, she leads by margins of 24 to 48 percentage points. So early news coverage might be dominated by good news for Clinton. A key state to watch is Massachusetts [HuffPollster returns here], where Clinton led by a median of 9.5 percentage points in pre-election polls. To be competitive for the nomination, Sanders probably needs to pull out a win there and must narrow the gap elsewhere.
On the Republican side, delegates are assigned pseudo-proportionally. If Trump’s wins involve vote shares in the 30-45% range, as indicated by polls, that’s enough to get him about 48% of tonight’s delegates. Combined with the early-state delegates, it would get him 53% of all delegates to date. Here, the news media’s tendency to focus on wins and losses is quite appropriate, since getting a plurality of votes translates to a majority of delegates.
So far, the trend is as expected. Hillary wins GA and VA by wide margins, Trump in strong lead in GA and VA, but not officially called for him yet. Sam was right days ago, when he said the cake is already baked 🙂
Rubio might be outperforming the polls in Virginia.
But Trump is still ahead.
According to the Guardian: Clinton wins Georgia and Virginia as Sanders takes Vermont.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2016/mar/01/super-tuesday-results-live-state-by-state?CMP=ons_b-supertuesday_c-us_g-1
Good live summary page.
For Olav: ABC is reporting that Hillary Clinton has won the American Samoa caucus, with 73% of the vote, and an 8-3 edge in delegates. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/american-samoa-results-election-2016/story?id=37193418
Calling AL, MA, TN for Trump.
Notice how they call these with close to zero results in. Gotta respect the central limit theorem.
From early results, couldn’t be worse for the Republicans in terms of narrowing the field. Cruz gets Texas plus second in 3 states, Rubio gets 0 plus second in 1 or 2, Kasich gets second in 2. No incentive for any of them to drop out.
Two turnout surprises. Many more Republican than Democratic primary voters in VA, while at the 30% point, primary voters in OK are about equal for the two parties.
OK was a closed primary. That’s why Cruz and Bernie did so well. The reform Democrats that would have crossed over to vote Trump stuck with Bernie instead.
There are a lot of voters this year that have Bernie and Trump in some order as first and second choice. We saw an enormous number of them in NH exit polling where Bernie and Trump overwhelmingly won independent voters that had to decide which party contest to vote in.
I don’t get calling these races when it is not winner take all. It’s about delegate count. If you can’t give me that number why bother?
Because everyone wants to know if Rubio can win even one state.
Someone is keeping tabs on the delegates. Not a live update (reload to see changes) and I don’t vouch for the accuracy of the numbers:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/167RlmxSvrotSiVHmaQuIio3BbGlCmrUgObX2kHM80yQ/htmlview?pref=2&pli=1&sle=true#gid=0
HuffPo has a pretty good delegate count. Check the top of this page, as well as the state-by-state numbers.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-03-01#OK-Dem
OK called for Cruz. I guess it really is occupied north Texas.
https://xkcd.com/787/
OK Dems go for Sanders.
Evidently Graham has chosen to be shot and said the party must consolidate behind Cruz because he is a clear second.
“Sen. Lindsey Graham did not mince words Thursday about choosing between Donald Trump or Sen. Ted Cruz, comparing it to a choice between poisoning or being shot.”
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/21/politics/lindsey-graham-donald-trump-ted-cruz-poison-or-shot/