Disruptions in Arizona and Nevada will reverberate nationwide
The concentration of pivotal races in Arizona and Nevada is astounding. Viewed in terms of individual voter power, I can’t recall anything like...
Senate: 48 Dem | 52 Rep (range: 47-52)
Control: R+2.9% from toss-up
Generic polling: Tie 0.0%
Control: Tie 0.0%
Harris: 265 EV (239-292, R+0.3% from toss-up)
Moneyball states: President NV PA NC
Click any tracker for analytics and data
2017 plans:
1) Test if within-brain communication defects can cause autism
2) Establish a partisan gerrymandering standard
3) Back up phone— Sam Wang (@SamWangPhD) January 1, 2017
Happy New Year, everyone! Tough year ahead – but there’s lots to do. Such clear challenges focus the mind.
What do you have planned for 2017? Not just about data or institutions.
Figure out how Euplotes, a one-celled (i.e. <= 1 neuron) organism, can walk: https://youtu.be/JnGCFOsL9uI?t=10s
O to be such an Olympian!
https://youtu.be/X-gfZc-oRVQ
Exciting plans, Sam!
What can we really do to increase the numbers of people who vote?
Don’t forget to back up your phone. Perhaps this can be delegated somehow, automated or otherwise scheduled.
Warm wishes.
Thw world has plans for you, Sam.
It wants you to explain last year.
I became concerned when the margin approximated what drug-testers call “a statistically insignificat difference”: 2%.
As a neurologist, you too may feel that somehow this is what happened nationally: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wTeQ2ly6Uw
Who else can I say this to? Thank you for so much.
Are these listed in the order of difficulty? 😉
What kind of ‘in-brain communications defects’? Physical/chemical disruptions?