All pain, whose gain? The surprising implications of a new legal theory for redistricting
(cross-posted with my new Substack) Lots of pixels have been spilled on a legal theory once considered fringe, the Independent State Legislatu...
Senate: 48 Dem | 52 Rep (range: 47-52)
Control: R+2.9% from toss-up
Generic polling: Tie 0.0%
Control: Tie 0.0%
Harris: 265 EV (239-292, R+0.3% from toss-up)
Moneyball states: President NV PA NC
Click any tracker for analytics and data
Are the Justices struggling with the many partisan #gerrymandering tests? Are you? @SamWangPhD of @Princeton helps us all out, on #HLRBlog: “An Antidote for Gobbledygook: Organizing the Judge’s Partisan Gerrymandering Toolkit into a Two-Part Framework” https://t.co/iZN381X3CO pic.twitter.com/6la2v5KZXC
— Harvard Law Review (@HarvLRev) April 11, 2018
At the Harvard Law Review Blog, I lay out a framework for organizing the many tests for partisan gerrymandering. The framework may be useful for establishing a logical and manageable standard to define the offense. Read “An Antidote To Gobbledygook“!
P.S. Monday April 17th: The piece is linked from SCOTUSBlog!
Today ScotusBlog has a link to this piece:
http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/04/monday-round-up-389/#more-269017