# Princeton Election Consortium

### A first draft of electoral history. Since 2004

Time to double the number of deaths Wednesday, April 8: US 5.0 days, NJ 4.7 days, NY 4.4 days

## Akin sheds 8 points overnight to near-tie

#### August 21st, 2012, 1:23am by Sam Wang

A new poll from PPP(D) gives Akin 44%, McCaskill 43%. The pollster says there’s “little difference” from before, as does Josh Marshall. Normally I don’t like to comment on one poll. But this interpretation is likely to be erroneous for two reasons.

First, PPP is making a comparison with its own previous poll in mid-May, showing the same numerical margin (Akin 45, McCaskill 44). It is more appropriate to make a comparison with polls conducted after the August 6th primary, since after a primary a nominee’s support firms up considerably.

Akin was +3% (median, n=3) before August 6th, and +11% (n=1) afterward — an 8-point bounce. So if he is unchanged since May, then he must have lost all this gain. An 8-point loss in one day is an enormous drop. Another comparison that makes the same point is that going from +11% to +1% (PPP) is a 10-point drop. Again, this is very large.

Why did PPP fail to notice this? Because they didn’t have an August 7th poll, and no way would they cite another pollster. This leaves them with a May-vs.-August comparison – and a major analysis error.

Second, even if we accept the premise of comparing with May, PPP has made a statistical error in claiming that a 1-point change indicates a lack of change. When comparing a candidate’s support between two polls, the difference has a standard deviation of about 3.5% and the 95% confidence interval is about +/-7%. All PPP can say from their own data is that since May, Akin’s support changed between -8% and +7% (95% CI). This is not very informative. But it does show how useful poll aggregation can be.

In the short term, this should make both Akin and McCaskill supporters more likely to contribute to their candidates, since the race is now probably on the edge. What happens in the long term is less clear. Is Akin too damaged to continue? Or will he soldier on?

Tags: 2012 Election · Senate

### 18 Comments so far ↓

• Bill N

It will be interesting to see if this all really changes this race much. Call me cynical, but given the rightward surge of the Republican party I find it hard to believe that his statements will change the outcome of this race. From what I have been able to gather from my readings, his opponent is hated almost as much as President Obama in Missouri.

• Olav Grinde

This is heartening. I do wonder if Akin will maintain his candidacy, considerably damaging the Republican brand.

Any thoughts on the GOP’s alternatives in the state, whether they can quickly mobilize behind another candidate (and if so, which one), should Akin drop out?

Sam, do you have historical information on comparable events?

• Olav Grinde

One more thing: I keep waiting for the “Ryan Bounce” to subside — but that does not yet seem to be happening. Quite the contrary, Obama’s EV estimate keeps being reduced as, it seems, the GOP have managed to put additional states into play.

Moreover, the Republican National Convention starts in less than a week, which I understand can be expected to provide an additional bounce.

To put it bluntly: I am worried…
I am worried that this surge in the polls and EV estimates may fire up the Republican base, while disheartening the Democratic base — which in turn could have a decisive influence on relative turnouts on election day.

Thoughts?

I would also note that last night’s poll was of Likely Voters vs. May’s poll which was of Registered Voters. RV screens tend to favor Democrats.

• For reasons of statistical sampling alone, there’s a considerable bit of uncertainty in interpreting any one poll. Time will tell, assuming Akin stays in past today, the deadline for withdrawing easily.

• Olav: I’m not convinced that most of what you’re seeing is real motion in the race.

First of all, contrary to what I said in another recent comment, several pollsters are now applying their likely-voter screens, which tends to remove a slight pro-Democratic slant that was there before.

Second, the motion in the EV count is within the range of variation of what we’ve seen since the beginning of summer, and judging from this site and from other aggregators of polls, I’m not convinced that anything has really significantly changed in the race since Romney clinched the nomination. Before the Ryan pick, Obama was at a maximum or near-maximum for the past few months, but it probably wasn’t anything more than the effect of some outlier polls.

I’d also caution anyone prone to get worried to just stop watching polls until the conventions are over, because the conventions are going to make them swing around a lot over the very short term.

• There is so much fluctuation in national polls that I would not place any weight on a single one. That said, they do seem to be reflecting what’s happening in the Meta-margin.

As I have written, there’s been about 1-2 points of movement. What I find remarkable is how little movement there’s been. Compare with 2004 and 2008.

• paul

If Akin wins in November, the country should seriously consider disenfranchising the state of Missouri. The average national IQ would jump about 20 points.

• Olav Grinde

@paul: It sounds like you’re implying that the Northern and Western US would find it advantageous to secede from the Southern States? That’s a very interesting idea…

• would it make sense to compare a bump to the size of the undecided-voter pool? in an era of near-total polarization, perhaps a 1% bump is relatively good?

• Or perhaps the actual swing, 8-10 points in one day, is huge.

• Olav Grinde

Sam — Your map has Florida moving from “leaning Obama” to rating the chances of the GOP winning the state as > 80%.

That is a huge change. Could you please elaborate?

• Bill N

I second Olav’s request. That is a huge switch in Florida in a short time. Are you including in your polls the recent one in Florida showing a Romney lead of 15 points? Nate Silver did an analysis of this poll and suggested that it is seriously flawed in its assumptions. Any comments?

• Not for now.

• […] Akin Survive? Ctd Posted at 1:45 on August 21, 2012 by Andrew Sullivan Sam Wang takes a closer look at the latest polling data (discussed here and here): PPP is making a comparison with […]

• sorry, i meant the ryan bump, not the akin/rapin’ swing.

• wheelers cat

The PPP poll was a “flash” poll, conducted over 3 hour time slice. Interestingly, the positive results from that poll (post the “secreting a secretion” prevents pregnancy in the case of “legitimate” rape gaffe) will encourage Akin to stay in the race.
Ben Smith says Akin bought ads for the 22-27, and Akin is not making any motions to step aside, inspite of the brays and howls from Limbaugh and Hannity.
Im dubious of the Ryan bump.
Sure the landlines love Ryan.
But there are at least two distinct cell phone demographics– cell-only households, and smartphone users. I think both are resistant to traditional polling techniques.
But just because those demos are unlikely to be polled, doesnt mean they are unlikely to vote.

• AlpsStranger

The Baydoun Consulting poll is clearly garbage.

Everyone is so afraid that some wingnut is going to say they have a liberal bias that they bend over backwards to create non-existent balance.