<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the track record of simple poll aggregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/</link>
	<description>A first draft of electoral history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:35:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: В Петербурге вводят водительские права на управление каретой</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>В Петербурге вводят водительские права на управление каретой</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Какая сумма облагается налогом, если в марте 2007 года по ГЖС была приобретена - Информационно-правовой портал UKON.SU (пресс-релиз)</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-2137</link>
		<dc:creator>Какая сумма облагается налогом, если в марте 2007 года по ГЖС была приобретена - Информационно-правовой портал UKON.SU (пресс-релиз)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: На заранее подготовленные позиции - Лига свободных городов</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>На заранее подготовленные позиции - Лига свободных городов</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Заходи, располагайся - Эксперт Online</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator>Заходи, располагайся - Эксперт Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-2076</guid>
		<description>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Жилье за рубежом: ажиотаж прошел, интерес остался - Континент Сибирь</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>Жилье за рубежом: ажиотаж прошел, интерес остался - Континент Сибирь</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the track record of simple poll aggregation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing Zhang</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing Zhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Dear Sam,

I heard of your website from your friend D. Smith.  True or not, your graphs have kept my hope alive for Obama and reduced my anxieties!  Let&#039;s hope your prediction will be confirmed.  Thanks, Bing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sam,</p>
<p>I heard of your website from your friend D. Smith.  True or not, your graphs have kept my hope alive for Obama and reduced my anxieties!  Let&#8217;s hope your prediction will be confirmed.  Thanks, Bing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>I would just like to second Colin&#039;s comment above, specifically: it would be nice to see some statistically rigorous comparison of the performance of poll-based and electronic markets-based predictions of electoral outcomes.  I&#039;ve just been over to electoral-vote.com and couldn&#039;t find anything about market-based predictions.

It&#039;s interesting that both poll- and market-based sites (e.g., intrade) claim to be superior, but I have yet to see any solid data to support these claims.  Do you know of any that you could point us to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to second Colin&#8217;s comment above, specifically: it would be nice to see some statistically rigorous comparison of the performance of poll-based and electronic markets-based predictions of electoral outcomes.  I&#8217;ve just been over to electoral-vote.com and couldn&#8217;t find anything about market-based predictions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that both poll- and market-based sites (e.g., intrade) claim to be superior, but I have yet to see any solid data to support these claims.  Do you know of any that you could point us to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd S. Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd S. Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Has Obama&#039;s &quot;red ceiling&quot; moved up any? A number of states that seemed deep red back in September (e.g. North Dakota, Montana, Georgia) are suddenly looking pale pink at best. On October 4th, you published a graph of the EV estimator as a function of a swing towards Obama in the current polls. Have we just been moving along that curve, or has the curve itself changed in the last three weeks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Obama&#8217;s &#8220;red ceiling&#8221; moved up any? A number of states that seemed deep red back in September (e.g. North Dakota, Montana, Georgia) are suddenly looking pale pink at best. On October 4th, you published a graph of the EV estimator as a function of a swing towards Obama in the current polls. Have we just been moving along that curve, or has the curve itself changed in the last three weeks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Wang</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Frank&lt;/b&gt; - I&#039;ve read that Obama cut an ad in Oregon. This type of activity is smart though overdue. Since he lags other Senate Democrats in support, remaining smart moves would be money transfers and House campaigns. Conversely, McCain (or perhaps better yet, Palin) could help Republicans by going to Georgia, Kentucky, and Mississippi.

&lt;b&gt;Mona&lt;/b&gt; - Polls specifically ask about Obama and McCain. Polling evidence suggests that Clinton supporters have largely fallen in line. Some were probably Republicans who wanted to vote for a woman, and are back in their party&#039;s fold. If there are any holdouts, there&#039;s no obvious reason for them to be more anonymous than supporters of Barr, Badnarik, Paul, and others. In short, polls are likely to reflect adequately the actual state of the race.

People should look at &lt;b&gt;Aaron&lt;/b&gt;&#039;s graph, especially the fact that the Meta-margin is still moving even as the EV estimator has reached a plateau. It&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;/2008/10/03/obamas-red-ceiling/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s red ceiling&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Frank</b> &#8211; I&#8217;ve read that Obama cut an ad in Oregon. This type of activity is smart though overdue. Since he lags other Senate Democrats in support, remaining smart moves would be money transfers and House campaigns. Conversely, McCain (or perhaps better yet, Palin) could help Republicans by going to Georgia, Kentucky, and Mississippi.</p>
<p><b>Mona</b> &#8211; Polls specifically ask about Obama and McCain. Polling evidence suggests that Clinton supporters have largely fallen in line. Some were probably Republicans who wanted to vote for a woman, and are back in their party&#8217;s fold. If there are any holdouts, there&#8217;s no obvious reason for them to be more anonymous than supporters of Barr, Badnarik, Paul, and others. In short, polls are likely to reflect adequately the actual state of the race.</p>
<p>People should look at <b>Aaron</b>&#8217;s graph, especially the fact that the Meta-margin is still moving even as the EV estimator has reached a plateau. It&#8217;s <a href="/2008/10/03/obamas-red-ceiling/" rel="nofollow">Obama&#8217;s red ceiling</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona</title>
		<link>http://election.princeton.edu/2008/10/24/on-the-track-record-of-simple-poll-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.princeton.edu/?p=1976#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any of the polls including those who are going to write in Hillary Clinton as their choice for president (and for that reason, I don&#039;t know how many of them there are). But I wonder if these people are included in the polls among those who say they are going to &#039;vote Democrat&#039;? That would then take away from Obama&#039;s numbers. Would love to know your thoughts. Thanks! And thanks for your great site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any of the polls including those who are going to write in Hillary Clinton as their choice for president (and for that reason, I don&#8217;t know how many of them there are). But I wonder if these people are included in the polls among those who say they are going to &#8216;vote Democrat&#8217;? That would then take away from Obama&#8217;s numbers. Would love to know your thoughts. Thanks! And thanks for your great site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
